Thread:Amrosa/@comment-25956839-20171127182643/@comment-25956839-20171128231243

QuickNick wrote:

Amrosa wrote: I think it is bad practice to not enforce a strict order within the "sentence." Totally agree ... but the nature of any Wiki means that if we move to named parsers there will be no way of enforcing it! And policing it would be a never-ending task for the Administrators.

I don't think this needs to be strictly enforced. There are mandatory parsers and optional ones. As long as the parsers are listed in the template, the orders don't matter, as far as the render engine goes. If there is a preference, to the order, the templates RR3 Wiki:Series Template and RR3 Wiki:Limited Time Series Template can be set. When new pages are created, using these templates, the same, consistent, order will be used.

These template pages are often tweaked between releases, to improve them for the next release.

The curent order is:

I think this is a common sense order, grouped with like items, in the order, they are displayed in the table on the article page.


 * Rolling Start=Yes

Is listed in the explanation at the beginning and end of the template, as it is so infrequently used.

If you think it is better to be included, at the end, before Version=..., it can be. Let me know your thoughts.