Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-35553674-20181024131719/@comment-2601:601:8380:2840:A8C8:83DE:BE23:2C37-20181026205449

Powerup777 wrote: 1) I consider pretentious snit to be non-toxic due to is reference to inanimate object, and because if I'm not mistaken, is used on Charlie and the Chocolate factory - a children's movie. Hard for an adult to take that one personally.

2) Thanks for showing my ban log of your attempts to leave "." and such non-value added flotsam on valid article posts (and reviving dead articles). I think you proved my point for me.

3) Not the way I want to spend my Friday night- as I'm a volunteer, but hey, here I am looking for your signature again. I'm not sure what you're trying to prove except you have VPN power. Just remember- karma comes in the least expected ways. 4) We leave the wiki open for anons, because this is a free forum team approach that believes everyone has a say (within the guidelines). How about posting something random on the Off-Topic board and have tonnes of fun there? Won't touch that as long as language is OK. OK? Rob,

This illustrates a couple points.

Firstly, "I consider" implies YOUR interpretation. An attack is an attack.

Per your "rules":

=
=============

Wiki Rules of engagement

Powerup777

Regarding your post:

Please note in the wiki rules, http://rr3.wikia.com/wiki/RR3_Wiki:Wiki_Rules "Users must treat other users with respect."

I am deleting your post for that reason. Please refrain from personal attacks of other users and keep conversations on target within the subject matter of that article. Thank you for your attention to this detail. I see you are a new member, we'll overlook this as you might not have known. We look forward to a positive relationship in the future and hope you find the information useful for your own game progress. Thank you again-

Powerup777 (talk)

=
==========

"Users must treat other users with respect", so regardless of whether one is attacked first, any user comment that exhibits disrepect for another user should be removed. And, of course, the original disrespectful comment should be removed as well.

Secondly, you and Michael (maybe others) apparently do not get it:

"I'm not sure what you're trying to prove except you have VPN power."

I don't use a VPN, don't need to. This exhibits that IP bans are fruitless, why even bother?

My point is that the administrators need to either narrow their tolerance for any "attacks", or broaden the subjective threshold of tolerance and not align yourselves with political correctness because it suits the particular situation. Subjective leniency of a user because they happen to be a valuable editor doing a lot of grunt-work opens the door of hypocrisy in the bureaucracy.

Lastly Rob, don't worry, I will eventually let sleeping dogs lie. However, others may fall in line behind, so if it is not the way you want to spend your Friday night, probably not best to poke the bear. Because, indeed, "karma comes in the least expected ways", don't be a hypocritical tyrant bully.

Have a good weekend. I probably won't be around much as I'll be working to catch up from being on vacation for a couple weeks. As a small business owner, vacation time means a lot of catch-up time.