Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25255992-20151016131308/@comment-26249703-20151017122459

Guillejarque wrote: 1st.- I don't want to be a sole admin, does anyone want to become?

2nd.- I know my English is not the best but I think it's enough. I'm trying to learn more.

3rd.- He led the style-change of the wiki, I can learn how to code and how to make templates. Now we can't change much more, just create new pages for coming cars, and if a new manufacturer comes, for example, then it would come the work into the infoboxes and templates.

4th.- I just don't have the time: 15 minutes at night to race and contribute. If you'd have my time then you would understand.

5th.- Too arrogant? Excuse me, but in that thread I just was asking MegaDriver80Wiki who where those editors that edit since 2013, because the founders are inactive.

6th.- If you want me to edit the pages with errors (now it's difficult to find a mistake), I'll do. I'm can contribute all time during the weekends.

7th.- Yes, I'm Michael's shadow. He has contributed much more and he should be the admin rather than me. But I just asked him and his answer was no.

The next major event comes Tuesday! Tuesday, yes! I would become just next Saturday. And, what have you done, exactly? 100 or 200 following edits in a day and then stop? And you are talking me that way? Wow, indirectly you are saying that you want to be an admin. If it's not anyone, then the wiki would get stopped. I can learn how to be an admin an carry on the blog, both things. If you don't give me the chance then I won't show up what I can do. 1. I still think more time should pass before this is brought up. If responsabilities are shared between many people, hopefully Michael would consider it.

2. In that comment alone, I can spot 16 grammar mistakes and 3 spelling mistakes.

3. If you claim not to have time to contribute small edits, do you really think you would have time for those tasks? Be realistic.

4. Following on point 3., do you think you're the only one with a busy schedule?

5. Maybe later on, but your comment clearly hints at your contempt of someone you perceive to be new (they may have been contributing without an account for a long time) slotting himself in the same category as you:

Guillejarque wrote: MegaDriver80Wiki wrote: We are the best wiki contributions Who do you mean with "we"? 6. That should just be an automatism for anyone using this wiki this consistently. I personally always note down any piece of information that may become relevant (such as rewards and completion bonuses) as I play and corroborate my information with what's on the wiki.

7. I am aware, you have stated this enough times. Innovation is important for the growth of the wiki, which is not a trait you particularly exhibit.

-Yes, ok, for this update the "main" event may be the size of "Lions of Leipzig" rather than "PoV" or "FAP:400" but I meant that we shouldn't rush and should instead go for the option of waiting a month, to see whether Kuzz comes back.

-You are being very selective in your representation of me, for this update alone, I ran FAP:400 twelve times to make sure no piece of information was missed by events differing, depending on which car was used at which point. I never abstain from editing when there is something that could help, even if it means less time playing myself (I usually start events a day or two late because of time spent editing) and you have been guilty of doing plenty of small edits in a row just for the sake of achievements, whereas I just got them without knowing some of them exist. In terms of what I have done overall, if you don't wish to look through my list of contributions and see exactly what it contains, I would hope that the upgrades strategy that I created and maintain with help from other contributors would prove my point. Do I want to be an admin? I wouldn't mind - it's not a priority of mine - but I'm not egotistical enough to proclaim myself to be one in the absence of the existing active one. You should perhaps take the hint that the person that made this wiki what it is now didn't want you to be an admin, nor the person that has contributed the most besides that. What do you mean "if it's not anyone then the wiki would get stopped"(includes a grammar error)? This wiki is self-sustaining and whilst I agree that a couple of things need to be changed that only an admin can do, it's not essential to the development, growth and continuation of this wiki.