Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-30576757-20170221050616/@comment-30576757-20170307204425

QuickNick wrote: P2dro.

For somebody who doesn't take (unintentional) criticism very well (in this thread No records have been found. WTTT you suggested that Darrell's innocuous comment was an insut!) you seem quite happy to criticise others!

Based on your comments, you think it makes perfect sense for there to be unwinnable races in RR3!

I don't wish to argue with you ... I just think you need to revise your definition of "cheating".

Nick Nick

With all due respect, I actually think a lot of people should revise their definition of cheating. So, slowing bots down is allowed in the game, but is still cheating but not considered cheating, but used by non-cheaters. When others find ways to gain an advantage, within what is allowed in the game, why are they labelled cheaters? Borrowing was allowed, why was that cheating according to others? Borrowing is still allowed, why is that cheating when slowing bots down is not?

As for unwinnable races, I do not know the FM logic behind that. Maybe they want players to cheat or keep on losing until they win. Nick, my point here is this - those who think they are on a higher moral ground and have the audacity to label others as cheater, should probably think about the times they themselves cheated.