Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-33340837-20180423035311/@comment-31446467-20180423131432

A Fandoom User wrote: Igor44 wrote:

Igor44 wrote: FU, Tilt A, assists off: 1:34.168 after half a dozen test runs. Wiil switch to tilt B next session. 1:33.895 with a potential for another -0.3 to -0.4. Parabolica is a gamble with me as has always been in real life as well. Two sessions of 50+ laps a year since 2009 and I still miss the braking point or open up too late ... You’ve driven at Monza? Awesome. Early last year I had registered for a track day with a company, Puresport, that organizes such events for cars over 300 or 350hp, I don’t recall exactly, but had to cancel due to conflicting business obligations unknown at the time of registration. Still on my to-do list, along with Paul Ricard and Spa.

Ah, that parabolica; getting it right is a fine art in itself... Puresport ... They had only F360 Challenge cars back in 2009. I crashed in their F360 on a wet day immediately after a warm-up lap going full throttle afte 1 variante ... Insurance did not cover the  damage so had to add 3,000 euros ... Moved on after them to audi/porsche affiliates with better cars, insurance terms and service in general.

Parabolica would be easier if we had controll over the throttle in RR3. Coasting for a fraction before the apex would be  the nearest to the real life behaviour of the car there. But it does not work with me here. As I said it's a gamble. I may be 0.3 ahead of my ghost on the back straight and then lose 0.5 in Parabolica. Nest ride and I'm behind on back straight but gain over half a second going out of P ...