Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-36677645-20200114234419/@comment-36677645-20200119234856

Thank everybody for paying attention to the issue.

I'd like to mention my conclusions one more time, from less important to most crucial:
 * 1) Old articles will not be checked and corrected. Actually this is a minor issue.
 * 2) Admins are given unusual functions to verify proposed content. There are a lot of more interesting things.
 * 3) The involvement of contributors will decrease. Wikis die of this.

I'm against any wording of the "old article" rule proposed. Soft wording of a prohibition will not help to contribute, again, just estimate time necessary to comply with the rule. Vague or, on the contrary, complicated rule will not work itself.

As I mentioned above, I don't see how proposed change will actually reduce admins efforts, I don't know an alternative to lessening admins burden, sorry.

Finally, articles with content that is no longer in the game can be protected.

Regards, T.W.