Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-28176594-20160922011403/@comment-28753807-20160924133655

the top and bottom of it for me isnt on how much gold they give us for free its how much they expect us to need to get all the cars and upgrade them to complete this 100%. if they give less gold but the requirements for future car upgrades are less then it would be the same as before the update although the IAP would become more valuable. this maybe FM's thinking of making racers purchase more. i dont know why they would do that rather than just lowering the price of the IAP but i am by no means a game developer and can only dream of owning such a profitable business. maybe that where i going wrong. maybe i need to play with my customers heads a little more.

I agree. I don't think name-calling helps us as consumers of the game. Our avenues of recourse for the problems we have with the game are not limited. I think if I were in Firemoneykey's business (purposefully misspelled), I would have someone monitor every forum possible -- especially one like this one. So, expressing your opinions here is an option that may make some difference. EA has their own forum for RR3: http://answers.ea.com/t5/Real-Racing-3/bd-p/real-racing-3-en. There are reviews that can be made on the stores where we download the game. Support tickets, though, I read on some website, that the forum gets quicker results -- if results are to be had. Someone said, when the button with the Free label was changed to Free R$ after 2 or some number less than 10, after getting 20 per day was the norm, The developers have found a way to take the unfairness out of IAP customers getting less ads to watch for. They took it away from everyone.

Which brings me to the final avenue of recourse: Play another game. We are not an organized group of players who focus our attention to RR3, then change to another game, if we are mistreated, but if we were, we might have more clout in the developing phase of the game.