Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-47.29.229.237-20180913153414/@comment-2405:204:B103:1FD3:ACCE:BDD1:1B0E:B1CE-20180915143801

HwyStar wrote: Don't even get my hopes up for NSX. I'm sure it will require near FU to win if they do though, and 6 laps at Spa with no skidding, no offtrack, drive in reverse and reach an average speed of 198MPH I think you're closely referring to 6.4 of Rennsport Redefined with 3 laps (minus the assumed avg. speed req). The stage certainly didn't req an FU Porsche and could be easily done with all 3s (or less for pro players). It however did require a good understanding of the car behavior and patience from the player (lack of which was supplemented by GC upgrades). HwyStar wrote:

whilst smashing every other car's rear window. If I can recall, only Speedrush Season 1 had this stage. Haven't smashed any rear windshield's in any SEs until now. It was mandated there due to the nature of the SE. DecadeHansen wrote:

Maybe an easier goal for an SE? "Tailgate 1st place within 20m for 12 seconds and win this event without exceeding 168 mph or running out of fuel". I think FM usually prefers the playing touch a certain speed while saving fuel rather than restricting them. I would like a speed restriction stage for once. Fuel, tyre wear & engine overheating challenges are my personal favorite as it makes the racing much more real than the actual plot of the stage. DecadeHansen wrote:

For the old (NA1) NSX, an LTS will suffice and it will cost the same as the 190E, FD, 350Z, or R34 in upgrades. IMHO, it would not be in the best interest of FM to introduce both the NSXs in the same release. If they both come in separately, then they can put the older one in another SE (which is very likely with Norm being the sponsor). I do like the idea of having only one SE in every update though like in 6.5