Thread:RR3 Michael P/@comment-1735079-20160803102958/@comment-26249703-20160804141343

I know a bit more about the situation and can hardly believe such a foul-natured user would consider himself to be the victim in all this. I'm disappointed the alternative version of the Wiki hasn't taken off, either :P

I personally would have been a lot less patient, Michael, so congratulations.

To TienShan0: I hope these two weeks gives you time to take a step back and reflect on your recent involvement. If you come back with the same MO, don't be surprised if you are blocked soon after, for probably longer this time around. The standard is to double the previous ban. The initial ban is also meant to be one day, but there was an accumulation of faults. When you combine that with your attitude, I can only agree with the initial ban length and would definitely consider the prospective future ban to be infinite, unless a distinct change in attitude is observed, along with less major changes such as design, renaming, moving etc. Most people sign up and contribute more and more over time, you just came out swinging, didn't you :P I also want to say that I do think you have potential to be a good contributor, a lot of your changes to content have actually been improvements, but you really need to consider that you can't just make everything how you want it to be and disrepect others as you have done.

I hope to see you back a changed man :)

Oh and one more thing: for someone so concerned with grammar and spelling, it surprises me that you sign off most of your edits with "Grammatic ...". Unless it's ironic (kudos if it is - that's my type of humour, but perhaps a little overused?), I'd like to point out that the correct spelling to the adjective is "grammatical".