Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-44512246-20191128054418/@comment-31558898-20191203133708

Tommy299 wrote: Amrosa wrote: Tommy299 This isn't some college kid writing an app in their dorm room. This is a business with significant costs that need to be covered. We need to stop with the "Pay to Play" BS.

Yes they are expensive, because the product they are producing is expensive to produce. And unlike the college kid in their dorm room, these are professionals who have families and mortgages, etc. They deserve to be paid for their work.

That they are giving players the option to play to win without pay real money, albeit slowly over time, says that they are being very reasonable. Just because you want it instantly for free doesn't mean what they are doing anything wrong, or that you are right. Sorry to say but your answer changes notthing for me.

If they need money to fund the investment they should put the content behind a pay wall and not limit players with silly caps so much that they need over a year to complete the actual F1 stuff if they don't pay to proceed.

I would like to invest heavily into the good content but they try do dictate the schedule over the course of the day. Here I have to say no, thank you.

Even if I had planned to pay for the content I don't anymore as I learned that even there they have put a max cap on. LOL this is stupid. They cannot completely put it behind a pay wall as that will drive away the younger people who are perhaps more financially limited than others who are more fortunate in that respect. It's that demographic that Liberty is desperately trying to attract to play the game and to watch the sport on the TV (despite it being behind many pay walls globally in that respect). They're trying to attract attention of the mobile gamers to be interested in F1 and they're using RR3 to do that.