Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-33870577-20190306105623/@comment-33870577-20190306152218

Mugwumps wrote:

I didn't say we had to feel sorry for them and I have no idea why they left gaping holes open for so long. No, no, not you, sorry. Typing with 6% battery left so I'm rushing 😬 I meant all those recent threads (here and on r/realracing) with people saying they feel sorry for what's happening to them etc. I mean ffs, they (FM) use some tool to randomly generate races for series. Because apparently it's difficult to think and use logic 😁 Or basically just try to apply some of great suggestions from many threads about that matter. Idk...

Mugwumps wrote: But it is what it is. I, too, am worried about what future costs will be (like whatever the big thing Amrosa hints at is), or the new LM cars. It could be crazy, but the last several updates have reminded me that the game is considerably more fun when you don't bother with the uninteresting cars. Given the new FM strategy of constantly throwing new content at us and promoting the new stuff at the expense of the old, it makes skipping the crap a much more viable strategy. What I personally like is that with Motorsports group we don't need to get all cars for 100%. That's fine and following that line I can see (and justify) why is there such increase in FU cost (but can't for "normal" Career cars). I know very well that it sucks for 100% garage players though 😑 +1 for everything your said here, btw.