Thread:QuickNick/@comment-26829117-20170726202536/@comment-26829117-20170729132719

Sorry, meant flag. I've updated it.

I'll never be disappointed if you can autogenerate these tables so that they are guaranteed to be correct and accurate. They are a pain to maintain when FM change things.

We can argue about the display format as much as you like but if the tables are autogenerated then I don't care that much. I think your tables are too cluttered (don't see the need for the name of the most expensive race) and not clear which is the best car and, as important, why but each to their own :-). I agree that the delta update would be a good addition but the comments are also vitally important so that people understand the why as well as the what.

The Masters of Speed, Vertex Series, Hybrid Hypercar Clash, Racing Spirit, Concept Car Clash and Tour Del Toto are the real test of any automatic generation. The problem is how do you account for Tour Del Toro which doesn't follow the rules above. I solved the problem by counting the initial upgrade costs against the Tour Del Toro which an automatic process can't do with the rules above (You have to subtract future saved costs to calculate the minimum cost strategy). At the end of the day, the strategy is correct when the upgrades recommended give the minimum gold required to complete career 100%. That is after all what the strategy claims to provide.

Enjoy the Grand Prix Qualifying, I'm going to watch it later. I'll see if I can work out an improved rule set for the problem mentioned above.