Talk:Victory by Design/@comment-49.35.97.39-20161214033815/@comment-28753807-20161214154425

I don't plan to complete this Victory by Design. I don't need yet another useless car. I'm not interesting in spending BRL and some to win some  and have another car in the garage. I looked at where it ranks among all cars (so far) and I'm just not motivated to win it. However, I am trying to complete 2.1 with no upgrades. I have lost the goal many more times than 4 and Magnus' time changes very  little from 1.20.x where x is 3 or 4. I'm sure if I were to upgrade, his time would increase making it easier to complete the goal. I don't understand, though why people consider it 'not fair' to weaken the 'bots. That is the whole point of 1) racing and 2) bot slowing/management -- to win the race. Why is it not fair? I think I will be able to win 2.1 with a couple of big corner cuts. I've seen some comments in other places on the wikia, that corner cutting isn't racing, or isn't fair. Why? There are examples in the game where they prevent corner cutting with barriers and with 'off-track' restrictions. Yet, some examples remain where it doesn't hurt our performance, it actually helps win a race. I suppose a purist may have that standard for themselves. Many times, those purist racers are racing cars that are more expensively upgraded -- so they can complete the Career Series, or the Exclusive Series. That is their goal. It isn't mine. So, why would my technique of cutting a corner a couple of times, so I can save some upgrade expense be considered not fair or cheating? Ok, I'm stepping down from my soap box. Race however you want. Enjoy your standards and your goals and your purchases. I'll do the same. I will try not to judge your methods and I ask that I be afforded the same courtesy. Oh, and BTW, don't feed the trolls, even if you consider me to be one of them!