Thread:RomGuyony/@comment-25956839-20151110195009/@comment-27155998-20151123190314

Thank you for the reply, I'll go in order

the tier number (e.g. 17.3 for the third race in the seventeenth tier) could be used instead of (or in addition to) the tier name: having the name only may be difficult to actually find the location of the race. The tier number only would help keep the cells over two rows only. Tier numbers were shown at first, but then I decided to hide them in order to save space and avoid text wrap. However, they're still present in the templates and in the rows, so it's just matter of making them to be shown.

Breaking down said table into categories (e,g, Amateur, NASCAR, ...) may make it more user-friendly Yeah, I thought the same thing, but I decided to leave data altogether in order to allow global sorting and wider data analysis. However is would be very easy to split data into categories.

As for any other changes that may be beneficial, I'm unsure of the layout used for the Race Series. Whilst it looks better, it may benefit from some little tweaks, as it's not always obvious which bonus series are associated to which career series. Some colour-coding or more borders may solve this, I'll think about it. Uhm ... I think that usage of different colours may be a good solution. However my real concern is for mobile viewers, since I think the new layout may be a little trouble. Need feedbacks.

I know the previous table included a time and ratio of rewards/time. This is subjective, of course, but may be helpful nevertheless. Maybe Michael will have a say about this if he feels he has feedback to add. No, I think there's no room at all for Time-related data in this table. First, it would be impossible to find space to place them. Second, if people is looking for most profitable races, there's already the other table (no room for data redundance). Third, as said by Michael, time is too much skill and PR related.