Thread:RR3 Michael P/@comment-1735079-20160803080813/@comment-26249703-20160804123435

Though this won't be relevant for another two weeks:

-Design would involve everything in a navbox/infobox etc that would display without any specific content added. It's obvious with an infobox, less so with a navbox. For infoboxes, anything added while using the template, with pipes and whatever is added alongside would be classified as content, any changes made to the template itself would be design. With navboxes, they're not often used and most of the time created by me or Michael as soon as there is a need for one, based on the current format, but there is a structure to them, which would be design, the info within would be content. You changing the name of the VULCAN in the navbox is changing content, so you're not infringing the rule, there, but changing it from VULCAN to Vulcan is changing the correct name to an incorrect one, so you're technically inserting false information, same with changing the page name, any other reference to it and any similar changes you've made since your recent arrival here.

-Why you changed your username was (as I see it) just a question formed out of curiosity, I don't think it really required you to go on the defensive so drastically. It was a form of communication past the informal nature of the follow-up statement, which was to say you changed it in a perhaps less-than-ideal manner or the ideal manner is itself less-than-ideal, which meant your previous username was being linked to your newer username's contributions, which meant either Michael or I had to spend time to fix it. It seems Michael has, so that's where that line of conversation ends. However, it seems hypocritical for you to ask Michael to edit his comment, when you later say that asking another user to make an edit is a violation of the Wikia guidelines.

-Protecting pages is a possibility, but it's quicker in the short term to undo changes than protect every single template, especially as not very many people feel the urge to make such changes and the latter is time-consuming (even if a probable time-saver in the long-term)