Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25956839-20151018161812/@comment-25255992-20151020155615

RomGuyony wrote: Guille, you should take all of this as constructive criticism. Contributors' views haven't changed, positive comments were just left earlier as they were easier to formulate. Pretty much everything that I and others have said in opposition to your request are things that you can improve. As an example, looking at Michael, he will tell different contributors the same thing over and over again without getting impatient or impolite: this is an important factor. Michael's altruism makes him a prime candidate. True, Kuzz didn't always exhibit this trait but without his contributions and standards, no-one would pay attention to this wiki. In reply to Michael: I would be interested but my time is incredibly limited at the moment due to assignments and am trying to keep my editing to 1 hour a day for the time being. If this is ok and Kuzz doesn't come back (and as long as it's ok with the community) then count me in. I think the main problem was that it was me who started all this discussion... And I don't know how to finish it. I still wanting, but now, with everyone against me... Romain, you say these criticism should be constructive, but into my mind I can't take them that way. I just want you to give me a chance, that was all, but you just destroyed my illusions. You made me look at my errors, and that's well. I promise I will change this all if you support me. But maybe you still won't supporting me.