Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-31526827-20190430070151/@comment-32545704-20190430195856

Ok Drestin apologies for the sarcastic dig, it's nothing personal by the way. It's not WHAT you say, but HOW you say it.

For example, instead of making assumptions you could have presented your post as a simple question: "Hey, I've noticed this thing, it seems a bit strange, I don't get why this upgrade costs X and that upgrade costs Y but they seem to return the same benefit. Does anyone know the reason, is there some other information, am I missing something? etc..."

Then you would have got whatever answers you did, including mine explaining that FM have confirmed the figures are rounded, what you see is not necessarily what you get, and you may well be getting the same value in both cases. Of course you can disagree and really neither of us can be certain, but I think it's quite likely. At the very least it's plausible, you can't deny that.

But instead, you always jump straight to the first conclusion which best fits your agenda, ignore any evidence to the contrary and get upset with anyone who doesn't think they are a bunch of greedy a$$hole bast**d w@nkers!

I know I shouldn't, but that is why I find it hard to resist taking the piss out of you. I'm sorry for that, but it's only meant in jest. You've dished out plenty anyway so you should be able to take it in the right spirit. If you showed a bit of humility and gave them the benefit of the doubt once in a while, you might get a bit more sympathy!

Why do I care? You could say there's a selfish interest in there. I want to see as many people enjoy this game as possible; the more people playing, making IAPs and watching ads, the more likely the game will last and we keep getting new tracks, cars and development. These forums get filled with so much negativity, maybe I'm just trying to balance the argument a little. It doesn't mean I think everything is perfect about RR3.