Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-28169398-20171015224354/@comment-28169398-20171016011405

Rr3daniel wrote: Why are you comparing a mobile game to a console game? Won’t it be better if you compare RR3 to another mobile game (which, there is nothing even close)?

I am at 89% completion. I have 18k gc and I only need 6k to finish the whole thing. I paid US$9.99 as an appreciation. The game doesn’t really cost anything. You don’t need to own every car to enjoy the game, just pick the ones you like, fully upgrade, and race. A mobile game should be less expensive, not more expensive don't you think? And not three times more expensive than 6 console games with tricked out kit, games that actually monitor online cheating so that people compete based on driving ability.

This post came out of the post about paying real money for the Holden and the OP insulting peoples ability to pay or not. The point is that this game is outrageously expensive if you follow their logic, and to point that out, I tallied up the figures, considering the timing of the releases of Forza and GT Sport.

The allure is autoracing, no? Not the platform it is on. This is a valid comparison of virtual autoracing and the costs involved should that be how you chose to use your time.

I am not at 100%, have only 67% of the cars only about 30, the early cars in the game are FU'd, but I still enjoy it. I like simulated realism, so I would likely enjoy the set up I described above more than RR3, but that isn't in the budget, either time wise or monetarily.