Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-109.69.5.143-20130730144653/@comment-24.150.185.180-20140603213435

Gledio wrote: so you're telling me that even that the Z4 is lower and more aerodynamic than the M3, still the M3 is faster , the engine of Z4 pushes more than M3, everything is in advantage of Z4  and still the M3 is faster , the only thing that i can get as another value fact is a drag race time for both. you can't say a car is more aerodynamic just because it's lower......lol. it's all down to the bodykit they are wearing. F1 cars are riduculously low, but the drag at high speed is insane all because of the high downforce the bodykit generates. that's why f1 cars have more than 1500bhp per ton but still struggle to get past 340-350km/h. sum it up then, my point is your comparison generally works on supercars because they have relatively low aero effect involving, more about mechanical stuff. on race cars,really you never know how they tuned it