Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-29799506-20180210150757/@comment-34676248-20180219070353

What a debate. It is not thread makers fault that debate is polarized, its the subject. I agree with meny points here. As for ethics, I agree with that to. I find it very important in my personal life. But there is scaling. It is not the same to cheat in a card game with no bet, and to cheat and someone gets hurt, or hungry. The problem here is that rules are weak, that is what discussion is all about. The problem is not in players or exploiters( cheaters are on other side). It is FM doing nothing. Fm creating rules, changing, making them unclear. In this debate you can clearly see that people can not even agree what is an exploit, and that is not becose one side uses them and other not. It is because FM grey zone.

Sabian you said for borrowing upgrades: " FM set up (deficient) controls to explicitly prevent this kind of strategy has made it clear that is unethical to do this".

Thats the problem- deficient. It is not clear that it is unethical. It will be clear when they write it down, ban all that do it or something like that more concrete. This is just to confuse players.

I think you are on the same side with Amrosa, you care for ethics, so does he, because he is devoted to state nothing but facts here because some folks invest real money here:)

My opinion is that we are the one exploited, but I wont argue on that:)