Talk:LAMBORGHINI DIABLO SV/@comment-37273333-20191017032526/@comment-29898480-20191020213852

Wow, assuming these stats are correct, the brakes are absolutely rancid. Amongst the worst in the game. Setting aside the Supercars (which define a whole new realm of bad brakes), to find a car in RR3 with brakes this bad you're either looking at the Hyundai Veloster, or something about 50 years old, specifically the '67 Cobra, '67 Camaro, '69 Charge, '71 Challenger, and Skyline 2000 GTR which is early '70s as well. The Diablo SV is no baby as it's pushing 25 years, but tires got a lot better during those 25 years of youth it has on the others.

Decade, in my view the acceleration just makes it that much worse, because you reach a high speed quite quickly and then spend the second half of the straightaway riding the brakes. Bad brakes are easier to tolerate in slower cars.

Brakes this bad make no sense on a car with tires this wide. The Veloster Turbo is running on 215 W or Y tires, and the Diablo has 245s up front and 335s in the rear running Z rated for sure. And it being the tires the stop the car, it's putting a lot more and grippier rubber on the road.