Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-43409776-20190806193135/@comment-31600610-20190808183319

Amrosa wrote: Error could mean lots of things. It could mean that they didn't reflect to cost of the car correctly in the model that determines its in game cost. It could also mean they tried a different pricing model and didn't anticipate that as many players would react negatively. But without any facts, your reading it as "typo" when that isn't what they said or may have meant does nothing but generate unnecessary angst.

The red flag for them should have been that the cost to win was >100% of purchase price, unless the error was them switching to a new pricing model. I've been critical of their QA many times. The rollback still does nothing to address the broken in-game economic model or repetitive game play. Error my butt. A programmer has to hard code the upgrade costs into each each upgrade category. I'm not sure how many cars have identical upgrade tree costs (I'm thinking maybe 10% or less?}, but this is a NEW car. They knew what they were doing.

An error is an accidental mistake. This was not one of those...