Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-35180316-20180409075909/@comment-120.20.14.204-20180425031850

HULK7WGX wrote: 120.20.23.28 wrote: HULK7WGX wrote:

120.20.181.62 wrote: BrucecBanber aka HULK wrote:

U mad bro? Appears to be the case with all the sarcasm littered through your post. Meh, maybe you trollin.

Whatever the case, sarcasm is the recourse of a weak mind. HULK "bro"

Actually anger and revenge are much lower down the order of basic human impulses, sarcasm is a tad more sophisticated?

I can only assume that by labelling everyone who disagrees with you a "troll" we are reaching the upper limit of your reasoning capabilities, so let's agree to disagree.

Just don't complain or try and play the victim card when FM takes remedial against your juvenile antics. Lawdy,  you start out sounding like a scientologist rabbitting on about their "tone scale".

Sarcasm is not only the recourse of a weak mind, it is also the lowest form of whit..apparently

Yup, "assume" makes the ass out of you, not me. I didn't allude to you maybe trolling because of a different POV. Clearly you are trolling with your passive/aggressive posting, sarcasm and being a grammar (you mean "remedial" what? *chuckle*) Nazi.

And that's fine!

Im a big boy nao and wear big boy pants.

What I have learned is, no matter how smart we think/pretend we are or as "sophisticated" as we may try project, there will forever be someone better somewhere.

FYI, not trying to be smart, Yes you are, and yet another of your posts shows ya not real bright. You had the audacity to point out typographical errors on my part, yet your last 2 responses clearly outline your hypocrisy on that alone. You keep making stupid analogies to try bolster your POV by comparing apples to oranges with your logical fallacies.

Ive seen such a POV before, many times in many arenas on many subjects.

Of course, there is a lesson for the audience to notate.

As I predicted, you fell for the bait - hook, line and sinker!

But putting aside your own complete lack of ethics, astonishing that you seem more outraged by the fact that I belittled you on a minor grammatical error? But don't let that dissuade from your tirade against FM, Okay?

Yes, I have no excuse for typographical errors. I really must learn to use that edit option with the same level of profiency as you do?

But you say the decision to go down this path you have chosen was not taken lightly; yet you seem to gloat about the fact that you make 1000GC in a single lap?

So are you the humble saviour loosening us from the bonds of slavery or just another self serving egomaniac?

But nevermind, IMO, at best you might occupy an obscure footnote in the annuls of history.

Apples and oranges fallacy I think not. I can slice them both the same way using the same knife. Just simply pointing out (when taken to extreme) the iodacy of your Modus Operandi since it appears you are bit short in the common sense department.