Board Thread:Off-Topic/@comment-38518555-20190716013635/@comment-38518555-20190809091909

Bkuave wrote: Some will tend to give the video credence simply because the narrator is a woman with a pleasant British accent. Like Fox Mulder they “want to believe”.

Was it only the original mission that was done in Hollywood, or did they shoot the sequels there too? I mean no offense, but as is said, if it’s too fantastic to be true it isn’t.

Next thing you know they’ll be a video claiming one can physically bend steel, just by rubbing it gently, with the prerequisite serene bearing and countenance. Edgar Casey and Uri Geller and the guy at Dealey Plaza on the grassy knoll handing out leaflets understand it’s all about the entertainment, and money. The general public is fascinated, all the while tongue-in-cheek.

Conspiracists are small in number, overwhelmed by the sensible majority. Not long ago, people believed almost anything, these days, not so much. Evolution, you can see it in one lifetime. The womans voice is irrelevent. The crews actions are telling.

"Sensible majority" dictates what "sensible" is. Again, agreed upon reality. Ironic people gooble up nasa video but question anything that isnt "the sensible majority". The "sensible majority" told us all smoking wasnt a health risk. We all know who that turned out. I get majority rule and all...thats democracy. 2 wolves and a sheep discussing what's for dinner.