Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-2607:FEA8:55A0:64D:305F:E2E8:4871:382-20180412005707/@comment-2605:A000:132E:8291:A915:6755:9579:D77D-20180412091358

2405:204:B109:3DC1:49F3:E0B2:51E2:E24D wrote: 2601:484:4200:E478:D01C:F521:3384:3405 wrote: What would be the problem with making up some fantasy tracks? I know I know its called REAL racing but still, give us some more tracks. Maybe run em backwards or something As stated above, unless players are willing to shell out real money, regular track addition does not seem like a good business idea given the investment. If you want fantasy tracks & also run them backwards try playing GT Racing 2 or Assoluto. It has enough fantasy tracks to keep you satiated. Play RR3 when you crave mobile realism again. I have brought these things up before too. I would rather have more tracks, even if they weren't actual real life tracks, than just the same old stuff all the time. Not sure I get the "purist" attitude, that all the tracks in this game have to be real. Melbourne isn't, and it hasn't hurt any. Besides, it would be a LOT less of an expense for FM, than licensing actual tracks. Lack of variety is killing the game. They need to do something other than just adding new cars every update.