Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26388545-20180124223032/@comment-28169398-20180127010917

MoisesGabby wrote: Amrosa wrote: MoisesGabby I think you are missing what I was trying to get at.

Since our posts and opinions can influence the way people spend their money, especially for users of known quantity, we have, what amounts to a fiduciary responsibility to provide the correct information and not just our opinion.

The part about how this wiki or FANDOM handles notification of Anonymous posts is a statement of Fact. Look at the Game Discussion board. Sometimes you see a post that says the last post was 5 days ago ahead of something that was posted 2 hours ago. If you click into the post that does not seem to be in the correct chronological order, you will see that there is a more recent post from an anonymous A FANDOM user.

And as for the value of the anonymous posts, from my experience here, the majority do not add value in the same way as many of the registered users do. That is an opinion that is open to debate as there is really no way to quantify that. Sorry, my friend, you can keep repeating facts as many times as you like. You can keep assuming that everyone is too stupid to understand you. It doesn't make any difference.

This has nothing to do with facts. It is about your attitude.

Hopefully one day you will find a way to understand. I will continue to enjoy your positive contributions to this community. So what would your suggestions be in how to administer the board (not my job here, but the the original of this post), and how to address opinions that are factually incorrect?

Do you acknowledge that if information that we give out is wrong, it could easily cost people real money?