Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-29746749-20180810171303/@comment-35180316-20180812053802

RandyMc wrote: HULK7WGX wrote: RandyMc wrote:

So at least to me, it's still not cheating. Randy, it matters not how you, I or anyone else sees it.

FM/EA have it written in it's core that they can call "cheating" as they see fit under the premise of "as intended"

They did this to RUStork a little bit back. The poor guy points something out, then not only gets his account banned, but also gets banned from the support site. RUS pointed out a 'clitch'. FM/EA then called him a cheat.

Expolits, clitches and bugs et al are considered cheating per "as intended" I know it doesn't matter what anyone thinks except FM, but the endurances are events in the game to see how far you can go. I just can't understand how that can be misconstrued as an exploit. That's the conundrum right there Randy. DEV write script for a specific action, then some "action" becomes "unintended" as a by-product.EA/FM then decide that the "unintended" action is not "as intended" and smack users for their (EA/FM) own shortcomings.

Its pretty much "make it up as you go along" type stuff IMHO