Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-35180316-20180409075909/@comment-35180316-20180427050959

120.20.194.40 wrote: HULK7WGX wrote: 120.20.14.204 wrote:   As I predicted, you fell for the bait - hook, line and sinker! Thank you for quanitfying why you are in this thread. Actually several points of contention have been raised with you to which you have had plenty of opportunity to respond to but instead have chosen to focus on a red herring. That iindicates to me that either your priorities are not in order or you are being tactically evasive.

So let's try again:

1. Why single out FM when it is clear that EA exerts downward pressure and they have the final say?

2. What gives you the moral high ground to tread on my toes and interfere with the way I play the game?

3. Why do you come across as boastful about your accomplishments if this path you have chosen weighs heavily opon your conscience?

I will add some more:

4. Without inspecting any source code why are you any authority on what bugs are fixable?

5. Have you written any of your own hacks and submitted your source code to FM or are you just exploiting other people's work for own twisted ends?

6. What solutions do you propose to combat realtime hacking? 1. You speak as if you have inside knowledge

2.FM are the ones stamping on peoples toes in all this. Blame EA all you like

3.Clearly I am not "boasting", as the pitfalls of my route are clrearly more than any benefit

4. It doesnt take the reading of source code to know or understand a minisule amount of extra code can fix the cheating. FM already use it

5. Why would anyone submit something FM already have and use as they choose

6. Im not totally conversed in writing code. According to those that are, it's a very simple fix

Although there is no 7th bullet point. I will add my own

7. Ive seen the agent provocateur  scenerio many times before. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then Occams Razor is applied.

"As Intended", right?