Thread:DecadeHansen/@comment-26829117-20180308100026/@comment-28169398-20180308150556

You mean like the Ferrari F60, which you assured Sirebel was the next iteration of the F50, except for the fact that, as I showed, Ferrari's own website of the 70 year history of the company showed that the only car ever deemed the F60 was an F1 car, a pretty poor performer. But you insisted that there was another F60, which Ferrari themselves had no record of.

Your information is only slightly more reliable than Hooi. Adding answers to old posts that have no relevance to what is going on currently only serves to push posts that do have current relevance further down the lists of the forums which is a disservice. You also take up the Admins time doing this, while they try to figure out why this is being raised in the first place.

Truth is objective based on facts. You are not providing truth, you are providing your opinion. Future can never be portrayed as truth because it has not occurred and there are no objective and verifiable facts. Reasonable predictions, based on past facts can be made, but you cannot state them as a truth.

If you really want to be helpful, wake up. Snap out of the fantasy world that you inhabit and really work on providing answers which are actually objective facts and not your wild opinions. Answer the questions that are posed today and don't dredge the muck of many years ago. Bringing back a question from three years ago that talks about buying a Gold car for R$ is a ridiculous thing to do. Don't do it.