Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25255992-20150805090535/@comment-25255992-20150807090726

Answering Nyuszko: The average PR would be a point somewhere where people can upgrade. For example, In Le Mans, a good point would be 93. It would be decided by the circuit length. In Le Mans, for example, 0.1 PR= 0.2 seconds. In circuits from 7 to 4 km, 0.1 PR=0.1 seconds. In shorter circuits 0.1 PR=0.05 seconds. But that's a great task that won't be applied this current tournament. Only the points.

Answering Rubeo38: I am not a fan of the PR too. There are lots of disadvantages. The average PR would be close to the fully-upgraded with money. But don't worry because next week the average will be fully upgraded with gold. Maybe you know which cars I am talking about. In Le Mans, the longest track, 0.1 PR=0.2 seconds. In circuits from 7 to 4 km, 0.1 PR=0.1 seconds. But in the shortest ones 01 PR=0.05 seconds. Then you have to calculate it, which is more work for you. Rent the upgrades? Keep doing it, I don't have that money/gold. I want fairness but it seems impossible.

Is the punctuation system fair?