Board Thread:Off-Topic/@comment-38518555-20190716013635/@comment-38518555-20190729032557

Powerup777 wrote: I disagree with that guy's interpretation of gravity. There are NOT just two forces (electricity and it's sister magnetism). His experiment and analysis was a sham. Clearly he had an anode on the upper plate creating a positive charge across the paper. That wasn't gravity, that was an experiment in electrons and protons attracting and repelling. Those elements (the atoms) which contain MASS, which is what comprises Gravity, ugh. You know who I am and what I know. why are you trolling me? A conversation requires two or more people. I'm really out of this one as I digressed many replies ago. It's been fun. You guys keep taunting each other on this thread, I'll be watching to make sure it doesn't go personal. Rob, I am NOT trolling you. Your suppositions are based on repeated scientism over the ages. Parroting something doesnt make it an actuality. Practical science based on scientific method will always show 'theory' to be nothing more than supposition, suggestion, postulate, a story etc etc. Mathematics can establish any theory, simply because a formula can be forumulated with mathematics with no practical demonstration. There has been many undeniable, irrefutable practical demonstrations that are long buried and long ignored by 'the scientifc community'.

Im not trying to offend you mate, nor am I trying to change your mind. I've messed up by allowing myself to go off onto a tangent that is well beyond my original purpose of this thread. But that's just the thing, it all ties into itself. I don't question your expertise in what you do. I question the rote learning about 'moon landing' and a myriad of other things that are above questioning by most people.