Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-30576757-20170221050616/@comment-77.231.119.56-20170222125138

Sabian2008 wrote: 193.30.164.114 wrote: Second, it may be accepted that the players will take part in this tournament with differently upgraded cars. This is how it goes in real racing as well. The technical parameters of a real life Forma 1 Mercedes car is not equal to a Williams car. This is why the level of upgrades may also depend on the financial situation of the RR3 players. Who has ever said that motorsport is cheap and available to anyone with equal conditions? I just really hope that you race with all assist off. Who ever said you could use an AI to help you drive a motorsport vehicle?

In any case... at least comparisons are getting more serious after the Monopoly analogy.

You are kidding, right? Any modern street/racing car is full of electronic assists: traction control, brake balance, assisted steering, launch control, etc. Just have a look at a F1 steering wheel. Sure they aren't AI (yet), but it's still assistance.

The point is, I don't mind if people use assists in RR3 or not. I don't mind if they slow the bots down or they prefer more of a challange. Pay real money or not. Watch ads or not. Farm or not. It's each player choice, it affects nobody else in the community. What I care about, though, is that players borrowing upgrades in WTTT were damaging the interests of the players who were pushed down in the classification and thus losing prizes. If a player had the resources and skill to be in group E but after borrowing ended in group B, that's 3 other players being pushed down one level, negated prizes to the benefit of the borrower. And that's unfair for those 3 players. By denying the borrower an undeserved reward, those 3 players will now have better chances. The measure is benefitial.