Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-36180858-20190206153942/@comment-31526827-20190209224859

Prange?? wrote: DrestinBlack wrote: Amrosa wrote: Just because EA is doing well, doesn't mean that they have not place significant pressures on FM for revenue targets for RR3. It may actually be worse because they are doing well. Do you know how poorly EA has been doing? They are constantly being hammered for being greedy. I’m sure pressure IS on FM to monetize even further.

Excellent example: https://youtu.be/BkNzxZHRpFA

How EA is doing: https://youtu.be/oZYyGPggzp0

Watch a few more from this channel and you’ll have your eyes opened, if you are willing. DB,

I agree with you.

Unless someone here on the wiki has the real facts and figures on the licensing costs and how they are structured,it's all hearsay.

I'm not an FM hater,but I won't drink the sympathy kool-aid,either.

I’ve never been a FM hater; I am a big hater. A bit too loudly for this forum hehe but that’s all I rant about. The lads programming are doing the best they can but their overlords and pushing minimization upon them mercilessly. Sadly, the ONLY way I’ve ever seen change from player input has been through outrage (one star reviews) bs calm cool year long commentary. Perhaps this Game Changers (ironically abbreviated GC) program may make a difference and I pray it does. I simply cannot get my friends to play, they don’t have the hours to invest and the IAP economy is brutally unfair